Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  Daily News  >  The decision of the Appeals Committee

      The decision of the Appeals Committee

      Appeal, Appeal committee, Corus, Holland


      Short 1-0 Cheparinov

      Decision of the Appeals Committee in the dispute between GMs Ivan Cheparinov and Nigel Short (English)
      January 20 2008 – Corus Chess Press

      Decision of the Appeals Committee in the dispute between Grandmasters Ivan Cheparinov and Nigel Short (8th round Grandmastergroup B) on January 20th 2008.

      The Appeals Committee (GMs Vladimir Kramnik, Michal Krasenkow, Judit Polgar) agrees that refusal to shake hands with one’s opponent before the game is an obvious violation of the behavioural norms of players in chess events.

      According to the decision of FIDE Presidential Board taken in June 2007, any player who doesn’t shake hands with his/her opponent (and doesn’t do it after being asked to do so by the arbiter) will immediately lose the game.

      However, according to the information obtained by the Appeals Committee, in the relevant case GM Cheparinov, after his initial refusal to shake hands with GM Short, didn’t clearly reject the arbiter’s request to do so.

      Therefore:

      We declare that GM Cheparinov must make a public excuse to GM Short in a written form before 11.00 hours January 21st 2008 for his refusal to shake hands.

      Then the game between Ivan Cheparinov and Nigel Short has to be replayed on Monday January 21st 2008 at 13.30 hours.

      Both players must shake hands at the start of the game.

      Any player failing to comply with the present decision forfeits the game.

      In order to avoid any conflicts in future we suggest the following procedure in similar cases: if one of the players deliberately refuses to shake his/her opponent’s offered hand at the start of the game, the arbiter shall officially warn him/her and demand him/her to do so. Only if the player again refuses to shake hand, he/she automatically forfeits the game.

      Posted by Picasa
      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Upset in the International section
      Next Article FIDE Rules

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • IM Kuipers & GM Shyam win Leiden Open

        July 24, 2017
      • 5 share Amsterdam Science Park after 6

        July 13, 2017
      • GMs Van den Doel & Ernst share Dutch Championship lead after 2

        June 27, 2017

      14 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 2:04 pm

        Cheparinov should not be forced to shake hands with Short, ever.

      2. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 2:28 pm

        Those pawns did not want to shake hands either…

      3. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 2:38 pm

        Again, to force bodily contact and exposure to disease seems ridiculous to me. What if the opponent is sick? Where has her hand been? You don’t know. If an opponent is forcing you to shake his (her) hand, how tight can you grip it? What if your opponent hasn’t showered in 3 days, or just blew his nose? Those arguing for a mandatory shake make no sense to me.

      4. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 2:45 pm

        I take it the replay is later than Monday 21st Jan – which was yesterday: Monday 28th?

      5. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 2:50 pm

        wouldn’t it be better for the players to exchange gifts before the round, or perhaps participate in a counseling session?

      6. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 3:08 pm

        What about those who, for religious or cultural reasons, don’t shake hands? Would a polite bow or courteous words suffice?

      7. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 3:44 pm

        How about kissing? Would that do? I wouldn’t mind having to kiss my opponent if she happened to be Sophie Milliet, one of the most beautiful female chess players in the world:

        http://www.europe-echecs.com/articles/IMG/jpg/Millet_Biel.jpg

      8. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 3:46 pm

        Hmm, the link didn’t paste correctly:

        http://www.europe-echecs.com/articles/IMG/jpg/Millet_Biel.jpg

      9. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 4:10 pm

        The Term “Shake Hands” is somewhat misleading. The FIDE precept actually states:

        “Any player who does not shake hands with the opponent (or greets the opponent in a normal social manner in accordance with the conventional rules of their society) before the game starts in a FIDE tournament or during a FIDE match (and does not do it after being asked to do so by the arbiter) or deliberately insults his/her opponent or the officials of the event, will immediately and finally lose the relevant game.”

        In other words, the rules require some polite acknowledgement of your opponent, not necessarily shaking hands. So all of these “what about…” statements are covered.

        I personally agree with the statement. Just as there are “personal fouls” in many sports, in chess, there should be some way of keeping extra-chessic (is that a word?) factors reasonably in check (so to speak.)

        Brad Hoehne

      10. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 4:22 pm

        Yeah i mean let’s get real here regardless of the rules, arbiters should be aware of them and warn players before forfeiting them. Personally, I think there should be some complaint against the arbiter in this case, in that respect.

      11. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 4:36 pm

        give everybody beta blockers before the game and forget about it

      12. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 5:29 pm

        {if one of the players deliberately refuses to shake his/her opponent’s offered hand at the start of the game, the arbiter shall officially warn him/her and demand him/her to do so. Only if the player again refuses to shake hand, he/she automatically forfeits the game.}

        The last part of this recommendation seems stupid. It says the bad sport player should be allowed to snub his gentlemanly opponent’s hand, as long as the bad sport shakes the hand later after being warned by the arbiter in a big to do.

        At that stage Short’s point becomes the winning argument, that the snub (and considerable inconvenience to others) has already taken place.

        Now that the rule is very well publicized, enforce it properly (on the first hand extension), or discard the rule entirely.

        GeneM
        CastleLong.com , FRC-chess960

      13. Anonymous Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 6:53 pm

        A forced handshake. Ridiculous.

      14. Phil Mitchell Reply
        January 21, 2008 at 10:36 pm

        What if I had observed my opponent go to the bathroom earlier and leave without washing his hands?
        Do I:

        1) Announce, “I don’t want to shake hands with him because he doesn’t wash his hands after going to the bathroom”

        OR

        2) Wear surgical gloves while shaking hands with him?

      Leave a Reply

      Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      April 2026
      M T W T F S S
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930  
      « Sep