Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  Chess Improvement • Daily News • General News • Major Tournaments • Susan's Personal Blog  >  FIDE election analysis

      FIDE election analysis

      Chess election, FIDE, Garry Kasparov, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, Tromsø


      FIDE Presidential Election Analysis

      The Kasparov campaign team was very optimistic about their chances prior to the FIDE Presidential election. He had plenty of financial support for a powerful global campaign. Kasparov himself and his teams traveled across the globe to spread his message.

      Banners, signs, billboards, and flags of Kasparov 2014 were all over the entire city of Tromsø. The election was held in Norway, which supported Kasparov. Things looked real good. But at the end, he lost by a huge margin of 110-61. In addition, all his candidates in other elections (VPs and Continentals) also were soundly defeated.

      The question is why did the delegates soundly reject the former World Champion and his entire slate? Even countries which supported Karpov and were traditionally anti-FIDE voted against him. Why did he get even lower numbers than other candidates in previous election after spending so much more money and time to campaign? What went wrong? What have we learned from this?

      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Winners of FREE trips to Qatar Masters Super Open with $110,000 prize fund
      Next Article Veleski wins Topusko Open 2014

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • Poland Captures Gold at 2020 Online Chess Olympiad for People with Disabilities

        December 3, 2020
      • Winners crowned at 2017 European Youth Chess Championship

        September 18, 2017
      • ACP Board Speaks Out About Tbilisi World Cup Scandal

        September 14, 2017

      18 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 10:07 am

        Because he chose a team which has a bad track record and horrendous reputation. This was a blunder.

      2. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 10:10 am

        The simple answer would be he’s an unsightly and obtrusive person.

      3. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 10:34 am

        Bad choices of candidates. Pichay had no chance. Neither did Danailov.

      4. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 11:16 am

        A combination of reasons:

        Some doubt his motives…chess or a public stage to push his other political ambitions in Russia.

        A team that was not known for chess.

        Not buying votes.

        Muck raking by his supporters, lowered themselves to wrestling in the mud

      5. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 12:10 pm

        Wrong to say bad choices. Even Pichay( PHI) and Danailov have their own chess programmes at their respective places. They also part of chess development . Kasparov can’t fight single handedly. That’s why he toured over the countries and got some supports. But, here the establishment of FIDE had its way catching its affiliates. Many know it is an uphill task for Kasparov’s team. Whatever said and done Kasparov was not treated well in recent years by the FIDE because as a citizen he voiced his protests against his political establishment. It would have been more dynamic and fantastic had FIDE ( Kirsan Ilyumzhinov)vacated the seated and laid a red carpet fo Garry. In fact every chess person/ body’s whole idea is develop champions. Here one single man with an unsurpassed record of 6-time world champ title knocked Presidents held the post for several years without opposition. But running a world wide chess body for 19 years and still clinging to it is not at all digestible. Finally Bravo to Karpov and let Ilyumzhinov continue as long as he wishes rather as wished by the goods train of Federations. At least this is the right time FIDE amend its election and other rules. Those principal office bearers holding the posts should seek two third majority. In fact in the Indian chess history very recently, Mr Bharat Singh ,Secretary,AICF had to vacate the post since he exceeded the duration of two terms of total six years. Let FIDE follows AICF and other similar federations. Amen

        • Anonymous Reply
          August 17, 2014 at 5:18 am

          National Chess Federation of the Philippines President Prospero Pichay has a chance program in the Philippines? You must fucking out of your mind! What program? Most of the top GM’s and IM’s including upcoming chess prodigies had packed or are already packing their bags and go in other countires & federation because there is no goddamn chess program in the Philippines ever since Pichay took over. The recent standing of Philipines in the Tromso Olympiad speaks the kind of “chess program” your claiming. You must be fucking taking drugs and high on it to say Pichay has a chess program in here. Im from the Philippines and THERE IS NO FUCKING chess program, the entire NCFP & chess here in Philippines is a MESS. Read Susan Bolgar blog so you will know. Jerk!

        • Anonymous Reply
          August 17, 2014 at 5:22 am

          You must be from Kasparov Party, the loser party sourgraping lol FYI There is NO CHESS PROGRAM in the Philippines NOR CHESS DEVELOPMENT under NCFP President Pichay. Pichay is concern on stealing all chess funds given by the government to enrich himself. The guy is fucking corrupt just like team Kasparov, all or most of the people who run & lost under your team are CORRUPT.

      6. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 1:20 pm

        Because the current FIDE team does a decent job in ruling the organization, no need for a change, Kirsan is good.

      7. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 2:34 pm

        Come on, Ignatius Leong? Really? This guy has switched sides so many times it’s really not surprising there is distrust in Kasparov’s team.

      8. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 2:34 pm

        Even the devil will not align with danialov.. garry did and paid the price..

      9. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 3:38 pm

        It’s like voting in a country with a dictator or under communism: what’s the point?

      10. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 3:42 pm

        He was too agresive

      11. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 3:52 pm

        I laugh at the notion that Kasparov didn’t win because of the unlikable nature of him and his team. Are you guys aware of who the incumbents were in that election and what their reputations are like? I’m not even a Kasparov fan, but he’s a shining knight compared to the cretin currently in power.

        Kasparov didn’t win because international chess, like the international olympic committee and far too many organizations, is rife with corruption. Payoffs and favors carry more weight than ideas or policies.

        A handful of morally bankrupt parasites line their pockets while the greatest game ever invented suffers because of it. Follow the money kids, follow the money.

        • Anonymous Reply
          August 17, 2014 at 5:27 am

          And most of the people who run under Kasparov party are corrupt too! Case in point Pichay of the Philippines, DISMISSED from government service due to a Php 400 million ($ 8 million) anomaly and charged also for corruption. You dont say the other party is corrupt thats why Kasparov lost, Kasparov party is also full of corrupt and dirty candidates. The other party just outsmart Kasparov strategies because Kasparov runs his mouth more often and offended a lot of federation with his uncontrollable mouth. He made more enemies than friends.

      12. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 6:41 pm

        The Asian Rat Leong – Kasparov thought this rodent can deliver 20 votes, and paid dearly both in money and support.
        Truth is, this rat is demised.
        Zurab will start a defamation suit against the rodent in its home nest, while the local authorities in his homeland had enough and will take stern action to eradicate the vermin.

      13. Ignacio Barros Barreto Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 9:26 pm

        Kasparov himself. Who wants an arrogant and self-centered person?

      14. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 10:06 pm

        Pichay’s mind, integrity and personality brought Kasparov done.

      15. Anonymous Reply
        August 16, 2014 at 10:33 pm

        Kasparov is not exactly a likeable personality and he did not do anything in the campaign to improve his charisma. He should have kissed babies. His opponent at least sent out letters congratulating new mothers. And yes, he had co-candidates who were equally uncharismatic. In the end, the other team also had much more money.

        The only way he could have possibly won was if he had convinced Susan Polgar to join his ticket.

      Leave a Reply

      Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      April 2026
      M T W T F S S
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930  
      « Sep