Liaisons to USCF committees:
Audit: Randy Bauer
Bylaws: Bill Goichberg
Chess in Education: Susan Polgar
Clubs: Randy Hough
College Chess: Paul Truong
Correspondence: Randy Hough
Cramer: Paul Truong
Denker: Paul Truong
Polgar: Paul Truong
Election: Randy Hough
Ethics: Joel Channing
Finance: Randy Bauer
Hall of Fame: Jim Berry
Internet: Paul Truong
International Affairs: Susan Polgar
LMA: Randy Bauer
Military: Joel Channing
Outreach: Susan Polgar
Professional Players: Jim Berry
Publications: Randy Hough
Ratings: Bill Goichberg
Rules: Randy Hough
Scholastic: Paul Truong
Senior: Jim Berry
States: Randy Hough
Survey: Bill Goichberg
Top players: Susan Polgar
TD Certification: Randy Hough
US Open: Bill Goichberg
Women’s Committee: Susan Polgar
Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
WOW ,that was QUICK!!
And also well done. Strengths seem to have been matched to the right people.
Let’s see, Education, International, Outreach and Women.
If that doesn’t suit you perfectly Susan,nothing does.
Nice opening
Continued Success!
Interesting that Channing only has one assignment. How many did Sloan have? No, I’m not suggesting their situation is comparable in any way.
Channing has ‘Ethics’ and ‘Military’ responsibilities. Can we all agree not to mention Sloan again: (a) it ‘labels’ by association, whether meant to or not, and (b) he’s bad news and history.
Susan and Paul have taken on a major slate of key responsibilities: that should be a notable contribution, especially given that they have agreed to forego claiming expenses from the USCF.
College/Education/Scholastic is also where the future votes are: good positioning. Good luck to SP and PT.
What is LMA?
What was the decision process / voting re these positions?
Why is there no interface to the role of computers in chess? It’s not just about the internet/web.
I just got a threatening email from psb@temple .edu I will turn it over to an investigator to find the identity. anyone knowingt this email address please respond to emoskow23@aol.com thanks.
To emoskov … sympathies …
1) Your investigator should refer the email to Temple University. They will see if they have a ‘psb’ and whether psb did indeed send this email. They probably have email logs, to ensure ‘acceptable use’ of their I.T.
2) I believe Temple would welcome, and even insistent on, the opportunity to disassociate themselves with the allegedly unacceptable email.
3) It may be that psb’s email address has been spoofed by someone on the Dark Side of the web and that’s it not from them at all: the router information may be evidence here.
4) It’s not a good idea to advertise your email address on the web: you’ll get spam and, worse, be impersonated via email.
I hope that’s helpful.