Shelby Lyman on Chess: Brains and Brawn
Sunday, January 26, 2014
(Published in print: Sunday, January 26, 2014)
The notion of athletes, especially boxers, as thinkers may seem counter intuitive.
It is commonplace to think of athletes as jocks and boxers as pugs. The language tells it all.
But it is really not a surprise that brains, not brawn, is often the ingredient that makes a winner, even in heavyweight boxing — a sport often equated, for good reason, with brutality.
Gene Tunney, Jack Johnson and Archie Moore, the Klitschko brothers, Vitali and Vladimir, who each have earned doctorates, and Muhammad Ali and Lennox Lewis immediately come to mind.
Such an enumeration can probably be made in any sport.
Chess itself is of use both inside and outside the ring.
According to BBC News Magazine, Lewis, who retired in 2004 as heavyweight champion, observed: “When someone calls you a name you want to punch them out … but chess teaches you to think through the next moves.”
Lewis was so convinced of the utility of chess in the ring that — to the consternation of his trainers — he would often spend several hours each day at the chessboard while preparing for key bouts.
It gave him, he insisted, a palpable advantage, all things being equal.
Against the American Mike Tyson — whom he characterized as a one-dimensional fighter — Lewis the chess player and strategist contrived to control the center of the ring.
Controlling the center, of course, is a key concept in chess.
Full article here.
Nakamura has both.