Every one has his day…Just because Anand is not the player he was does not mean Nakamura can reach his heights. Please can only intelligent people be allowed to comment. Rymario.
Every one has his day…Just because Anand is not the player he was does not mean Nakamura can reach his heights. Please can only intelligent people be allowed to comment. Rymario.
Magnus is good and so is Anand. What is the issue here? Magnus is at his peak (23 yrs) where Anand has , well passed his 23 years. If Anand wins , for sure he is a much better player.. If Calssen wins, this proof that he is better than Anand in this time.. How he will play when he reaches 43? Only time can say.
Also I remember Bobby Ficher time. He is one of the best, but I still believe Karpov would have won if that match had happened. The west needed anon-Russian player won and organized its media to portray him as in invincible.
Nakamura is much more talented than Anand.
Carlsen is more talented than anyone in this generation. Nakamura is not even 2% close
Every one has his day…Just because Anand is not the player he was does not mean Nakamura can reach his heights. Please can only intelligent people be allowed to comment.
Rymario.
Every one has his day…Just because Anand is not the player he was does not mean Nakamura can reach his heights. Please can only intelligent people be allowed to comment.
Rymario.
yes it is a mind game and talent game.
Magnus is good and so is Anand. What is the issue here? Magnus is at his peak (23 yrs) where Anand has , well passed his 23 years. If Anand wins , for sure he is a much better player.. If Calssen wins, this proof that he is better than Anand in this time.. How he will play when he reaches 43? Only time can say.
Also I remember Bobby Ficher time. He is one of the best, but I still believe Karpov would have won if that match had happened. The west needed anon-Russian player won and organized its media to portray him as in invincible.
Is it happening now?