Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  General News  >  Knockout concept?

      Knockout concept?

      Malaysia


      Friday January 9, 2009
      Game for a knock-out booty?
      CHESS By QUAH SENG SUN

      Imagine a tournament where every level pays a prize money.

      I WANT to discuss a concept with you today. Imagine this: a knock-out tournament where the winners of each round gets to win some prize money.

      Interesting concept, eh? The idea is definitely not new but it has not been tried anywhere here before. So why don’t we think about it? If our chess associations can find the sponsors, such a tournament may well become a new fixture in our local chess calendar.

      I know what you readers are thinking, that finding sponsors may not be the easiest thing for chess organisers right now, seeing that 2009 will be a very challenging year with the global recession threatening our shores.

      Therefore, this idea can only be a proposal for the future. Nevertheless, who knows, maybe it will be possible to find a sponsor today and the idea may well take off.

      I’m talking about a knock-out tournament of maybe 60 to 80 players, but an ideal number will be 64, the number of squares on the chessboard but more importantly, 64 players will allow the field to be halved perfectly after every round right until we get the final two players.

      In each round, the paired players will be required to play a mini-match of three games with the winner advancing to the next round. In case of a tie, the players will go into a play-off until there is an outright winner.

      Now here are the interesting parts. The mode of play for the tournament will be very flexible. The players themselves will decide how they want to conduct their games. Thirty-minute time control? No problem. Sixty-minute time control? Also no problem. Just as long as the mini-match gets played and a result obtained.

      Next, the players themselves decide when and where they want to play within a given time frame. It can be on a neutral ground or it can be in one of their houses. They decide and then they play. All results are then reported to the organising association.

      The most interesting aspect of this idea is that the winners in each round will win a prize and the value of the prizes will double with each round.

      For example, in a knock-out tournament of 64 players, the organisers may offer a RM20 prize for each of the 32 winners of the first round and the prize increases to RM40 each for the 16 winners of the second round. In the third round, the winners will get RM80 each and in the fourth round, it will be RM160 each for the winners. By the time we get to the fifth round, there’ll be four players left and the two winners will get RM320 each. The sixth and final round will determine the winner who will get RM640.

      By my reckoning, a tournament such as this will need a prize fund of only RM3,940 and the eventual winner, having played in all six rounds, get to collect in every round. I shall leave it to you to work out how much the winner will receive. It’s by no means a small sum and half the field gets to win something.

      Of course, I’m not thinking of only one tournament. We can have many running across the country at the same time, each catering to their particular area. The organising association only needs to coordinate the players, collect the results and determine the next set of players.

      Moreover, if the national federation can play a coordinating role as well, they can even bring the final four or eight players from each tournament together to a central location for a finale. I think the possibilities are endless. What do you think? Is it possible?

      Here is the full article.

      Read his blog for the occasional chess articles at http://ssquah.activeknights.org or join Malaysia’s biggest chess mailing list by registering yourself at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chess-malaysia

      Posted by Picasa
      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Chess in Las Tunas, Cuba
      Next Article Florida vs Oklahoma

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • We don’t want our female players getting unhealthy ideas

        May 11, 2017
      • 12 year old Malaysian girl “harassed and humiliated” at Chess Tournament

        April 30, 2017
      • Interview with Bakri Alia, Malaysia board 1

        September 5, 2016

      8 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 3:07 am

        Susan, if I get your idea right…there will be 0 prize money for draws?? If that is the case…IT’S AN AWESOME IDEA.

      2. KWRegan Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 3:13 am

        Congratulations to Susan on winning $100,000, instead of chez-moi, just now.

        Can anyone figure out what I’m talking about?

        🙂

      3. polyp Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 3:40 am

        No.

      4. SugarDom Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 1:15 pm

        First of all, this is not write-up by Susan, anonerds…

        Second, there are no hard rules so the participants are likely to end up chessboxing….

      5. lionel davis Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 3:04 pm

        Excellent tourny idea im down with that, yo Reagan you ready to play ive been putzin around too much, you gotta get me warmed up so i can smash p. blatny. haha, see ya soon.

      6. KWRegan Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 6:02 pm

        Hi, Lionel, sorry we missed each other last month. I’m off to Montreal this weekend, until July. Except, I’m back in town on the 19th and Tue. Jan 20th, and it might be symbolic to play a game of your-style chess on either of those particular days…

        The answer to my teaser is that Texas Tech and my University at Buffalo football teams both had spectacular last-minute touchdown plays that were finalists in the Pontiac $100,000 Game-Changing Performance Scholarship Challenge. Texas Tech won the vote. Who knows, perhaps the scholarship recipients will mind their Ps and Qs (and KRBNs) more than their Xs and Os!

      7. lionel davis Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 6:54 pm

        Ok Regan cool the 19th and 20 is fine maybe we can play 2 or 4 games. The Langston Hughes Centre have agreed to let us play there see you then!Peace. Thanks Susy ,sorry i missed you in Niagara Falls maybe next time!

      8. KWRegan Reply
        January 9, 2009 at 8:29 pm

        OK, send me an e-mail at regan [at] cse.buffalo.edu and we can make arrangements. Evening of the 19th probably best. I can suggest 2 games: the first your way, and maybe the second my-way, which is thematic for at least the first 8 moves.

        To make this generally relevant: “my way” starts with players alternately placing pieces behind the row of Pawns, subject to Bishops on opposite colors, King between the Rooks, and maybe at least one Rook in a corner, without the symmetry requirement of FischerRandom Chess, but retaining its castling rule. Committing last gives Black the edge in the early going, which hopefully counteracts White’s first-move pull, and in particular enables Black to put Kings on opposite wings and create imbalance.

      Leave a Reply to KWRegan Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      April 2026
      M T W T F S S
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930  
      « Sep