Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  Chess Improvement • Daily News  >  Letter to ChessToday.net editor

      Letter to ChessToday.net editor

      Cebalo, Chess Today


      Letter to ChessToday.net editor:

      Dear Alex,

      While looking at the comments after the end of the candidate matches, I was surprised that nobody mentioned the fact that we were just one step close to have a challenger who didn’t manage to win a single classical game, due to ridiculous tournament rules.

      What was wrong with a normal double round tournament with Sonneborn-Berger as a TB? How comes that players accept to play with such ridiculous TB rule?

      When doing my comments in official tournaments (EC 2009 Budva, 2010 Rijeka) I used to criticize such a rule and this year in Aix les Bains it was finally eliminated. Below you can find my final comment at the EC in Budva:

      “Looking at these games which were full of turnarounds, blunders and even losses on time in completely winning positions, I cannot avoid raising a question about the regularity of such a system. According to myself there are couple of things that are highly controversial.

      First of all, why a player must win one more tournament to confirm his victory according to the standard rules (Sokolov (NED) in this case, who was first on Bucholz). What is even worse, that second tournament is played with completely different rules (knock-out system, rate of play). Especially arguable is the rate of play which has nothing to do with the tournament play.

      It is quite clear that such games offer a spectacle (today there was a double number of enters on the official website), but a portion of additional stress suffered by the players after 11 days of tough battles makes much more damage comparing to the profit.

      The problem is that all these strange ideas are coming from the amateurs who never found themselves in such situations, while on the other side chess players are inert and not organized at all in order to be able to have some influence in such cases and to bring through their own ideas.

      I used to be a FIDE delegate for 4 years (1991-1995), long enough to know how things are going on in that organization.”

      With best wishes,
      GM Misho Cebalo

      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Chess trivia
      Next Article Ponomariov leads Ukrainian Championship

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • 6 Georgian players forfeited

        March 26, 2012
      • A beautiful tribute to Dad from Graham Brown

        March 7, 2012
      • Interview with GM Miso Cebalo, 2009 World Senior Champion

        November 17, 2011

      2 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        June 16, 2011 at 5:29 am

        FIDE should ask Greg Shahade about crazy ideas for chess tournaments. Maybe FIDE should adapt the bidding for time to decide a championship. Better yet, let bid money.

      2. Anonymous Reply
        June 16, 2011 at 3:07 pm

        Cebalo makes good points. Maybe he should try to get all the professional players to get together to protest ridiculous time controls.

      Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      April 2026
      M T W T F S S
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930  
      « Sep