Open letter to FIDE and the organizers of the Khanty-Mansiysk Chess Olympiad
Dear chess friends,
The Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk can be completely ruined. I think the organizers wanted to make an excellent thing funding money prizes for individual results but they probably didn’t quite catch the devastating effect on the team competition this move can bring.
I kindly ask FIDE and the organizers to urgently reconsider this decision. See the explanation and details in the following letter.
Board prizes at the Chess Olympiad.
I have just seen the news of the money prizes to be awarded for the best results at the Khanty-Mansiysk Chess Olympiad this year. The news is partly excellent but partly, alas, sad and devastating.
The team money prizes are the excellent part of the news. The best squads deserve to get rewards for their successful effort! And parity of men’s and women’s prizes is an absolutely just idea! However, as an experienced participant and occasional team captain at Chess Olympiads and European Team Championships, I am extremely concerned about the individual money prizes. They can ruin the performances of many strong teams and lead to pressure and conflicts within the squads.
For many years we had a similar situation in the Polish national team, when individual board medals were rewarded with government prizes and stipends. That led to the situation of players with good percentage scores (which guaranteed them medals) being not interested in playing in subsequent matches as they could just lose money! As they were the strongest points of the team, that led to tremendous problems. Even if the players were convinced or forced to play, they couldn’t play normally, usually lost and spoiled their individual and the team’s results.
The most spectacular story happened at the European Team Championship in 1999, when GM Robert Kempinski was going to win his board (and government stipend) with two rounds to go. But at the same moment our team was sharing the second place. Being the playing captain of the team, I convinced him to play. Both Kempinski (who played extremely nervously) and our team lost terribly in the penultimate round. Subsequently I had to withdraw Robert from the last round, saving the bronze board medal and the stipend for him but “sacrificing” our team result altogether (finally Poland ended up on the 17th place). With high money prizes for individual board results such situations will become typical for many teams!
Therefore I kindly ask FIDE and the organizers of the Olympiad to reconsider their decision. The best solution would be to cancel individual money prizes (including the rating performance prizes) and increase the number of team prizes.
If the organizers insist on rewarding individual results, then the sytem of awarding medals and prizes should be definitely changed, i.e. point scores, and not percentage scores, should be counted for the board rankings. That would encourage players to play more games and score more points. A similar system was successfully used in the Polish league. Although, taking into consideration the high value of the prizes, cheating and pre-arranged results can still be possible.
As for the performance rating prizes, I don’t see any way to eliminate their devastating effect on team results, and such prizes should be definitely cancelled. I am sure team captains and federation activists from many countries will back this appeal.
|
Kind regards, |
This open letter was published on chessbase.com
He made a good point.
He is spot on.
He is on spot. Spot looks worried.
Chess is a game for professionals. If GMs are paid or want to be paid, they must know that there is something called pressure and all professional sportmen deal with it. And since I believe the Sofia Rule is not an option but should be an official rule, team strategies should not be taken into account, since the game has to be played to the end, and therefore individual prize moneys should be granted. If chess has not yet got into something respected and professional, it’s because of those amateurish considerations !
Commentator Tournier’s remark would be on point, if GM Krasenkow had not been writing about team events. In that context, GM Krasenkow’s point is so clear and obvious that it is saddening that it must be spelled out.
Alas, I think i will be surprising if Krasenkow even gets back an official response.
You can easily fix this in your team. As a captain, and recuiter for the team, just make sure that all players agree that any individual money prices will be shared equally among all participants – or else they are not part of the team.
This will avoid controversial behaviours during the tournament and and any controversy will take place during recuitment, that is at a time a captain can sack anybody that does not agree to the team’s goals.
There will be two types of teams. Ones that want to win the team competition, and others who try to get prizes on one or two boards.
Commentator anonymous, the decision to play for individual prizes suppose that you play for a win. And the mentionned problem is that it can go against team strategies. But the problem is that team strategies are based on an illegal and scandalous rule, which go directly against the art of the game. So if Fide decisions can go against this, I really enjoy it !
It seems to this anon that commentator Tournier is responding to some other open letter than the one that GM Krasenkow actually wrote. GM Krasenkow was not advocating perpetuation of a corrupt system, as Tournier seems to imagine.