Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  Daily News  >  Putin – “Person of the year”

      Putin – “Person of the year”

      Person of the Year, Putin


      Time Names Putin ‘Person of the Year’
      AP
      Posted: 2007-12-19 09:48:57

      NEW YORK (Dec. 19) — Time magazine on Wednesday named Russian President Vladimir Putin its 2007 “Person of the Year.”The nod went to the Russian leader because of Putin’s “extraordinary feat of leadership in taking a country that was in chaos and bringing it stability,” said Richard Stengel, Time’s managing editor.

      Putin, 55, is enormously popular in Russia, presiding over a resurgent economy flush with revenue from oil and natural gas. But critics say he has moved the country away from Russia’s democratic reforms of the 1990s by tightening control of the media, courts and parliament.

      “He’s the new czar of Russia and he’s dangerous in the sense that he doesn’t care about civil liberties, he doesn’t care about free speech,” Stengel said.

      Putin recently endorsed protoge Dmitry Medvedev’s presidential bid, and later said he would accept Medvedev’s offer to serve as prime minister if Medvedev is elected in the March 2 election.

      Many believe Putin would remain Russia’s real leader, regardless of his title, though Putin has said he would not undermine his successor. The Russian constitution limits presidents to two consecutive terms.

      Here is the full story.

      Posted by Picasa
      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Use it or lose it!
      Next Article Special chess contest – $300 in chess prizes

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • Abandons Russia over opposition to Putin

        March 1, 2014
      • Meeting with President of Russia

        June 3, 2012
      • Police detain Kasparov’s team members

        June 1, 2009

      22 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 7:52 pm

        So does this mean that Kasparov is only jealous of Putin’s success?

      2. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 7:59 pm

        No, it means that Kasparov disagrees with the methods Putin uses to stabilize the country.

        Hitler also stabilized Germany. But then… (I am not comparing Hitler with Putin here, ok?)

        Oh, and a recent poll made by the independent Russian TV station WPW (what Putin wants) shows that 137% of the Russians would vote for Putin a 3rd time, while the remaining -37% prefer the opposition leader.

        This shows Putin gets less popular in russia because the poll is 24% below the result Putin got the last election.

        😉

      3. Pawned! Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 8:10 pm

        This is an early April Fools joke, right?

        Polls. Independent Russian TV stations. Uh, ok.

      4. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:16 pm

        137% ? LOL

      5. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:17 pm

        well, he deserves it.

      6. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:25 pm

        I believe Putin is a dictator and a very dangerous person. Of all the billions of people on this earth and Time Magazine picks Putin? Unbelievable.

      7. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:34 pm

        Please cancel my subscriptions to TIME Magazine immediately!!

      8. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:36 pm

        cause you don’t know and don’t want to know. you believe and it’s enough for you. u have already formed my opinion and don’t want to mess up with the facts

        btw it doesn’t mean that time mag or people who picked him approve or agree etc. stalin was a real dictator but was chosen a person the year twice – and for a reason

      9. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 9:46 pm

        This is an ABOMINATION! If rising to power at the cost of freedom is laudable, then Hitler should have been “Man of the 20th Century”.

      10. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 10:22 pm

        You mean Time Magazine is still around? They’ve pulled this kind of stunt for years — naming Adolph Hitler and Stalin as two of their previous winners. It’s all in the name of hyping it up to try and save lagging magazine subscriptions. And rightfully so. When’s the last time you even THOUGHT of “Time” magazine? They’re such a non-issue anymore, it doesn’t even matter…

      11. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 10:40 pm

        Before it gets much further, it should be understood that by “Man of the Year”, the original publishers of TIME meant the person who had the greatest impact on the news in the past year – which is why guys like Stalin and Hitler all have won. It isn’t some type of “Gee he’s a nice guy” award and if people would do a little reading on the TIME site and not flip their lid they would understand this – there have been many figures which have evoked a lot of controversy who have been named but all have been dominant newsmakers.

        Like him or not, Putin certainly has control of Russia and will have this control in the forseeable future. Because of Russia’s geographical location (from Eurasia to East Asia, arctic circle), its historical interests (Slavic ties to southeastern europe), its natural resources (oil, natural gas, diamonds, gold, heavy metals) and its numerous issues (human rights, getting along with neighbors) he’ll have an effect which ripples out over the whole world, so you might as well get used to having him around.

      12. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 11:08 pm

        Here is their “reasoning,” if you want to call it that:

        he has performed an extraordinary feat of leadership in imposing stability on a nation that has rarely known it and brought Russia back to the table of world power. For that reason, Vladimir Putin is TIME’s 2007 Person of the Year.

        This seems a silly and unconvincing reason to give Putin this “award.” The Soviet Union had plenty of “stability” for a long time. And if you want a successful leader in 2007, you wouldn’t think of Putin.

        But I am happy whenever Time gives their “award” (because that is how everyone views it) to a skunk like Putin because it means more and more people develop a negative opinion of Time. Their circulation figures decline every year.

      13. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2007 at 11:40 pm

        I think the argument that Time chooses this award for the person with the most ‘impact’ is flawed. Time chooses what it feels will generate the most controversy (hence, this entire blog) and will also get people talking about their rag of a magazine. That’s all they care about. They knew they could get people riled up if they named Putin the “Person of the Year,” in particular at at time when he’s being criticized for aiding Iran in their nuclear ambitions. That’s the ONLY reason they chose him. To get people talking about their rag of a magazine, even in a negative light. The real idiots are the ones who actually think it’s a legitimate award…

      14. KWRegan Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 2:51 am

        “I’m going to play 1.e4! and make my opponent give me Pawn and move. No 1.g4 nonsense for me!”

        Oh wait, this isn’t a provide-a-caption item… 🙂

      15. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 2:55 am

        could someone explain ( with facts ) why putin is a ” dictator ” ??? i am young, and would like to understand

      16. Anthony (Los Angeles) Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 4:10 am

        Well, TIME named Stalin twice, so I guess Stalin’s heir can get one, too.

      17. Michael C.M. Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 4:46 am

        no surprise from a magazine that has been pro communism and anti American every second of itrs existense

      18. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 7:19 am

        So is it all over for kasparov?

        Time for another retirement perhaps, this time from politics.

        Looks like Anand will have his wish fulfilled.

      19. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2007 at 8:37 pm

        Why is he a dictator? Well, for one thing he has complete control over the media. And not only that but at least one reporter turned up dead. I would say that’s complete control all right. And then there was the poisoned Russian in England and it was traced right back to Russia. Did you notice Russia didn’t turn over the suspect to Britain?

        And then there is this last election where employees have to vote while their bosses watch them. Intimidation? Is that Democracy? And I’m sure there are many other examples.

      20. Anonymous Reply
        December 21, 2007 at 1:44 pm

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/
        russia/article/
        0,,2230924,00.html

        Putin person of the year but thief of the century!

      21. Anonymous Reply
        December 21, 2007 at 3:15 pm

        See if this link works about Putin’s wealth.
        http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,,2230924,00.html

      22. Anonymous Reply
        December 21, 2007 at 3:21 pm

        One more time: here

      Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      April 2026
      M T W T F S S
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      27282930  
      « Sep