Menu   ≡ ╳
  • News
    • Major Tournaments
    • General News
    • USA Chess
  • Puzzles
  • Improvement
  • Event
  • College
  • Scholastic
  • Women
  • Search

        More results...

        Or you can try to:
        Search in Shop
        Exact matches only
        Search in title
        Search in content
        Search in comments
        Search in excerpt
        Search for News
        Search in pages
        Search in groups
        Search in users
        Search in forums
        Filter by Categories

        Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • SPICE
    • Videos
    • Susan’s Blog
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Menu   ≡ ╳
    • News
      • Major Tournaments
      • General News
      • USA Chess
    • Puzzles
    • Improvement
    • Event
    • College
    • Scholastic
    • Women
    • Search

          More results...

          Or you can try to:
          Search in Shop
          Exact matches only
          Search in title
          Search in content
          Search in comments
          Search in excerpt
          Search for News
          Search in pages
          Search in groups
          Search in users
          Search in forums
          Filter by Categories

          Try these: Sicilian Defense, Empire Chess, USA Chess

      Home  >  Daily News  >  Topalov: The Kremlin won’t admit that Kramnik cheated

      Topalov: The Kremlin won’t admit that Kramnik cheated

      Breaking News


      ChessBase just published an article about Topalov. Here is a part of the interview:

      What happened before the fifth game?

      Topalov: We got the videos of what Kramnik was doing between every move. He was going to the bathroom many times and his behavior was very suspicious.

      They accuse you of trying to disturb him because he was winning.

      Topalov: We never wanted to stop the match. There were clear indications of cheating [“Había claros indicios de trampa”]. You look at that tape and it puts the fear into you. It’s not just how many times he went to the bathroom, but how he went. Many times he came out, came to the board and moved instantly.

      He alleges health problems.

      Topalov: That’s a lie (“Mentira”). I drank more than he did and didn’t go to the bathroom so often. We protested, but the committee, which had sided with us, was fired.

      They say it’s inconceivable that the rival team had access to private video.

      Topalov: They also saw my video. They followed my every step and everyone who was with me. And if he’s not doing anything wrong, what’s the problem?

      The full article can be read here.
      Posted by Picasa

      Chess Daily News from Susan Polgar
      Previous Article Image of the Holidays from Brazil
      Next Article Must know endgame

      About Author

      Susan Polgar

      Related Posts

      • FM Saeed Ishaq shocks another grandmaster at Dubai Open Chess Championship

        April 9, 2015
      • King’s Indian for Black – IM David Vigorito … and more

        January 26, 2015
      • Faceless opponents

        December 27, 2014

      86 Comments

      1. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:33 am

        Come on, leave Topalov alone.

      2. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:59 am

        Topalov is a sore loser. He can not lose with dignity, so he keeps up these accusations of Kramnik having cheated. If only his chess game is as big as his ego, maybe he would have had a chance…

      3. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:00 am

        This whole issue of “cheating” shouldn’t really come as a surprise these days. Chessbase, CA, Arena and Scid are available to anyone who wants them. (Only Arena and SCID are free). Computers have altered the game and because of it…our consciousness toward the game has changed. Accusations like “oh, you’re using computer analysis” becomes common.

        This whole issue can be addressed in only one way…allow computers during chess matches. Since it’s impossible to prevent cheating with tiny computers…the only way to “stop” accusations of cheating is to allow these computer assistants during matches. GM Gary Kasparov came up with a compromise…”Advanced Chess” he called it. Players can utilize a comptuer DATABASE…to check variations and then use the analysis over the board. The distinction however is clear here…only databases should be available to the players…NOT the actual engines themselves.

        I would like however to hear GM Susan Polgar’s perspective on this issue. She might have some interesting things to say. In fact, now that she’s running for a position in the USCF…I believe its in our best interests to HEAR what she says on the whole issue of “cheating” in chess and how it can be dealt with.

        The ball is now in your court GM Susan Polgar. We await your response on the issue of computer cheating.

      4. HubDiggs Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:05 am

        This talk of cheating is never going to end. What can be done to stop these accusations? Even if both players are required to play each game without leaving the playing hall there can still be talk of installing a chip in someone’s head or something like that. What will the future bring? Is it just going to be a World Championship Cycle where the loser will claim that the winner has a chip in her/his head?

      5. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:17 am

        What organizers of events should do is to make it compulsory for participants to forbid anything other than a pen for the players (even a watch should be prohibited ) to wear on themselves when they arrive in the playing room , and they should prevent the players from leaving the room , if they want to leave the table , they have to sit in the same room not far in another free table to relax , and players must be forbidden from wearing a jacket or any clothes that could help conceal an object ,nor they should communicate with people directly or indirectly other than the referee.

        And assistants should make sure the players don’t conceal any object by making a body check on all players at the entry of the playing room .

        That would help dealing a little with the cheating , because even though i think Kramnik and Topalov never cheated , with the computer chips getting smaller and smaller , it’s now part of chess to create rules to prevent it as much as possible .

      6. Daechine Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:27 am

        I think it’s time to invoke the FIDE ethics committee. Topalov is out of line with his accusations for which there is no proof. I used to have respect for him before this whole mess but at this point this issue is going on my nerves and I think it would be appropriate to start taking legal actions against this libel. Either provide evidence and sue , shut up, or be sued. In either case, stay out of the news and leave us alone. I really hope tournament organizers will boycott him for this behavior, it is clearly hurting the image of chess as a sport.

      7. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:35 am

        Toiletov…I mean Topalov is still crying. Should we call him Cryalov or Cryalot?.

        I think he’s just a puppet of Cheatalov… I mean Dainalov. Should we call him Dianalov or Cheatalot?

        Post your comments but, keep it clean please.

      8. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:42 am

        In the last issue of New In Chess Kramnik shows respect for Topalov. I think Topalov should be ashamed of himself the way he complains and the excuses he presents and show some respect for Kramnik and shut Dainalov’s mouth once and for all. Moreover, he should fire him and get another manager who doesn’t keep damaging his already blasted image.

      9. Blue Devil Knight Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 5:12 am

        People should play in the nude after a full cavity search and x-ray. They should be in a soundproof room with nobody present. Only hundreds of cameras filming every square inch of the room for subtle cheating. Aside from the wiring for the cameras, only two wires allowed: one for the board to transmit results, and the other for the single flourescent light.

        The bathroom will be in that same room: it will be a hole in the floor. The hole will include cameras and be inspected by both teams before the match. An arbiter will huddle in the hole during the match to make sure signals aren’t being transmitted via patterns of flatulence or loaf squeezing.

        It is the only way.

      10. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 5:43 am

        Topalov believes it (cheating) happened, but doesn’t have sufficient proof. Kramnik should sue him.

      11. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:03 am

        Why such a big deal about what Topalov said?
        Look how I see this:
        He has the right to think whatever he wants and I have my choice to ignore him.

      12. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:33 am

        >>Topalov is out of line with his accusations for which there is no proof.
        The proof is ample and obvious. The problem is that so many people prefer to ignore it and talk trash here and on other fora.

        Direct proof:

        1. Official protocol, stating that inernet (UTP-5) cables were found under the ceiling tiles of Kramnik’s toilet, signed by the match director, the chief arbiter, 2 members of the delegation (Makropoulos and Bovaev) and Topalov’s manager.

        2. Photoraph of the cables, published in non-tabloid newspapers (Trud, Marca and possibly others).

        3. Videotapes showing Kramnik visited toilet before each move and closed the door.

        4. Guilty reaction of Kramnik and his manager which did everything to stop showing those tapes to journalists.

        Indirect proof:

        1. Analysis showing that Kramnik’s moves corresponded to Fritz when he visited toilet, and were different from Fritz when he didn’t.

        The fact that ChessBase and Russian media did everything to suppres this evidence shows how corrupt and biased are chess administrators and media that reports the events. The opinions here show that a great percentage of their readers are biased too.

      13. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:37 am

        >> Last time I checked, most residences have cables strung everywhere in the house.
        Gregory, do you have an internet link to your toilet?

      14. jimMD Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 7:08 am

        I got a nice box of Kleenex if you need em Veselin…..really don’t be afraid to ask!

      15. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 7:38 am

        It is really amazing to see how many people support the proven cheating of Kramnik.

      16. dr_no Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:10 am

        At last the truth:

        The Russians have perfected photo-resistant, around-the-corner invisible-to-the-human eye transparent fiber optic data cabling over distances up to 20 meters.

        Once these hit the market, test-taking will never be the same.

      17. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:18 am

        Gaging by this picture of Topalov, he should make a bee line for the nearest clinic. He looks like he just had four or five stiff vodka tonics…

        This habit of getting blitzed then spouting off to the media can only do him harm.

      18. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:34 am

        Have You ever been in Russia?? Go, find out what is going on there and than You understand what Topalov was afraid. But of course this do not proof that Kramnik was cheating…

      19. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:36 am

        >> Gaging by this picture of Topalov, he should make a bee line for the nearest clinic.
        Said by yet another fake shrink.

      20. LP Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:53 am

        After the cables, it is even better how he justifies losing in the rapid games.
        I am tired of these accusations, maybe he should think about the errors we did during the games as a reason for losing the match.

      21. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:55 am

        Kramnik cheated?
        No, I dont think so. He blundered in both matches, against Topalov and Fritz(checkmate en both cases).

        Topalov should learn to “win with grace and LOSE WITH DIGNITY”.

      22. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 8:58 am

        I think in the future all games should be just played with 25 minutes control/40 moves + 10 secs.

        The player can not leave the table.
        No going to restroom.
        You can not wear anything while playing, except glasses. No cellphone, no watch, nothing on your pocket except glasses.

      23. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 9:12 am

        >> You look at that tape and it puts the fear into you. It’s not just how many times he went to the bathroom, but how he went. Many times he came out, came to the board and moved instantly.

        Proven by the videotapes. Kramnik and his manager did everything possible not to give this evidence to the media.

      24. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 9:32 am

        >>Topalov should learn to “win with grace and LOSE WITH DIGNITY”.
        To be silent after being cheated out of the World Chess Champion title is not a dignity, it’s a cowardice. Topalov speaking out now means that he overcame his fear of the Russian mafia. He’d better hire a bodyguard, because most people know that the next step of those criminals is an assasination attempt against Topalov.

      25. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 9:41 am

        >>Toiletov…I mean Topalov is still crying. Should we call him Cryalov or Cryalot?.

        I think he’s just a puppet of Cheatalov… I mean Dainalov. Should we call him Dianalov or Cheatalot?

        Post your comments but, keep it clean please.

        Cheatnik, Toiletnik, Fritznik, Internetnik, Contractnik, Cowardnik, Profitnik, Complainik.

      26. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:02 am

        >> The Kremlin won’t admit that Kramnik cheated

        This title is very accurate because the cheating in Elista was organised by the Russian government.

      27. LittleMouseSings Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:06 am

        Nobody has yet pointed out the obvious!

        The Topalov camp are playing for an invitation to Mexico!

        Topalov expects the rematch challenge to be turned down and these accusations are timed to make double sure of this.

        In declining to enforce the rematch FIDE will offer Topalov a place in the finals tournament.

        Anyone wiloing to bet against this?

      28. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:08 am

        >>Anyone wiloing to bet against this?

        And who is the other side of the bet? Little Mouse Sings … Tra-la-la

      29. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:12 am

        >> Topalov believes it (cheating) happened, but doesn’t have sufficient proof. Kramnik should sue him.

        Kramnik will never sue Topalov, because the evidence for cheating is enough for any fair court to ban Kramnik from playing chess forever.

      30. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:22 am

        >>One would think that this is a plot out of a bad B class movie out of Hollywood, but it is a shame that it is happening in real life.

        It sure is a shame for a pretender for the chess crown to use those KGB methods. Really happening on the stage before audience with Toiletnik consulting his computer before each move.

      31. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 10:38 am

        In the ChessBase:
        >> … claiming that everything was orchestrated by the Kremlin and KGB, which also threatened him and his team physically. Read and be amazed.
        There is nothing amazing in Topalov’s interview. Most of the things he says were published long before in other media, supported with evidence. Maybe the ChessBase editor wants us to be amazed in his late reaction. Nah, nothing amazing in that either.

      32. MayanKing Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 11:03 am

        I thought Kasparov was the biggest cry baby but it seems Topalov has surpassed him!

      33. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 11:37 am

        you know, when fischer first hurled accusations against the kremlin it was received with similar apathy.. now weve heard how the did conspire to draw against each other.. anyone remember what happened to korchnois son during the match with karpov? the soviets may have changed the packaging, but the product is still the same.. journalists and ex-kgb agents, even kasparov has drawn the ire of the big red machine.. i wouldnt put anything past’em

      34. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 11:56 am

        >> He [Kramnik] alleges health problems
        The official diagnosis of Kramnik is polyarthritis. This is inborn back pain. To allege that this condition makes him go to toilet every 5-10 minutes is a gross lie playing on the ignorance of the audience. Even people with renal and bladder conditions do not go so often in the toilet. And Kramniks disease has nothing to do with urination frequency.

      35. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 12:24 pm

        i have the prof of kramnik cheating

        here is the picture
        http://msucares.com/insects/fireants/images/ant4_lg.jpg

        this ant… obviously photographed in kramniks and and room, has a elo of 4500 and was trained my the KGB to morse code all the moves to kramnik, that was the way he cheated in the rapids.

        poor topalov… the nº1 turned into a crybaby… what a shame

      36. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 12:34 pm

        This is so amazing. Even if there is an ounce of truth to this…Kramnik will not lose his title. So, just as we all must deal with loss in life…move on and try again. Or, whine like a baby.

      37. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 12:52 pm

        >>Even if there is an ounce of truth to this…Kramnik will not lose his title.
        It is really amazing that Kramnik will not lose his title which he stole by cheating.

      38. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 1:08 pm

        Topalov won’t admit that he cheated, even though the rules are pretty black and white.

        “I believe that [Kramnik’s] play is fair, and my decision to continue the match proves it. We are humans, and sometimes we make mistakes.” — Veselin Topalov, 10-4-2006

        So, was Topalov lying when he said this? His violation of Ethics Rules has been so persistent in this case that I think he should get the full three year suspension from rated play, as prescribed by FIDE Ethics Rule 3.2.

      39. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 1:26 pm

        I don’t think Topalov is being unrespectful: All he says is true. If anyone wants to check out, he just have to see the videos and verify it.

        Kramnik resigned a whole point to have the commitee fired; and consequently, not to take into account Topalov’s query (which was very reasonable, in my opinion, just to have a common rest room: that implies ‘NO ACCUSATION OF CHEATING’, just ensuring the fair play, but Kramnik reacted in a very wrong way)

      40. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 1:29 pm

        I am sick and tired of this story. The only way to handle trolls is to ignore them. Topalov is a troll who trolls the news pages. We need to ignore him.

        I have resisted supporting a ban on topalov but now I will support such a ban. he has simply gone too far too often. he needs to grow up.

        This was a sporting contest between 2 people. It was designed to have a winner and a loser. topalov lost. this is another problem with draws in chess. the players think they should never lose.

        Topalov needs more losses so he can get practice learning to live with loss.

      41. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 1:31 pm

        here is the title to this thread.

        Topalov: The Kremlin won’t admit that Kramnik cheated

        Susan a better title would be

        Topalov won’t admit that he lost to Kramnik fair and square.

      42. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:10 pm

        >> Topalov won’t admit that he cheated,
        Topalov won’t admit that he cheated because he didn’t cheat. Kramnik cheated.

      43. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:15 pm

        >> “I believe that [Kramnik’s] play is fair, and my decision to continue the match proves it. We are humans, and sometimes we make mistakes.” — Veselin Topalov, 10-4-2006

        ChessBase lie.

      44. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:46 pm

        Chess is dead…

      45. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:48 pm

        I admit that it’s easier to call Topo names (and can be fun, too!) and write this off to sour grapes. I want to believe the WCC has integrity and I hate to think that Kramnik would cheat.

        BUT, this is a stunning accusation directly from his opponent, and has to be taken seriously. Without a comprehensive investigation not only of the cheating accusation but also the process of resolving it at the time, the title is going to have a cloud hanging over it. Would it be productive to analyze Kramy’s moves w/ a computer and see if it could be determined, based on his style, past playing patterns, or level of play, whether some of his moves would be very unlikely without the aid of a computer? Any computer wizzes out there that can answer this?

      46. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 2:52 pm

        >> Chess is dead…
        Not yet, but it will be if the Russian mafia takes revenge by killing Topalov.

      47. Vohaul Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:06 pm

        Q: greatest human chess world champion ever?
        A: Capablanca, maybe.

        Q: greatest human chess player of all times?
        A: Kasparov or / and Fischer, maybe.

        Q: most pathetic human chess match loser of all times?
        A: Tarrasch and / or Topalov, for sure.

        Q: greatest silicon world chess champion ever?
        A: Junior, maybe

        Q: greatest silicon chess player of all times?
        A: Rybka or / and Fritz, maybe.

        Q: did Kramnik cheat in Elista?
        A: Yes – but only on himself by smoking cigarettes in the “boy’s part” …

        Q: do you know an official building without UTP-5 cables in the ceiling?
        A: No, of course.

        Q: is the FIDE “russian territory” as it was in the sixtees of the last century?
        A: no – but it is corrupted – not by Kremlin (no black and white there anymore, but simply petro dollars, euros or yen…), but by monetary conflicts of personal interests.

        Q: Will we have pro-chess in – let’s say 20 – 30 years?
        A: No …

        Q: Doe’s pro-chess influence your own amateurish “chess insanity”
        A: not at all!

        thx, Mr. Vohaul for this interview … :))P

      48. Graeme Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:09 pm

        This is most disturbing, on a couple of counts.

        1) Topalov is repeating behavior already denounced by the ACP as disgraceful, without really providing any new information.

        2) In this article, Topalov is admitting, in effect, that he himself lied when he said he believed Kramnik’s play was fair. This article claims that he only said that stuff during the match out of fear for his own safety, and a desire for prize money that he thought he’d lose if the match were cancelled. He’s confessing to an improper motivation of his own without really getting anything in exchange for this confession.

        3) The biggest bombshell of the article, though it’s downplayed, is Topalov’s accusation against Kirsan himself. Topalov alleges that not only was cheating going on, but that the FIDE President knew all about it and did nothing, because he was just following orders.

        Though Topalov doesn’t blame Kirsan personally, this is simply too serious to do nothing about at this point. Remember, that Dr. Ricardo Calvo was declared persona non grata by FIDE for saying far less against FIDE.

        Topalov has made some serious charges here, in a very open manner. If his charges are true, Kramnik needs to be stripped of the world title, and Kirsan needs to be stripped of his office. Anything less is unthinkable.

        But if his charges are false, or unprovable, he needs to get what Calvo got. He’s moved beyond attacking Kramnik to attacking FIDE itself. Not that I’m opposed to attacking FIDE in principle, but if you make an accusation like this, you’d better be prepared to prove it.

      49. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:10 pm

        Come on, cut the crap already!
        Please ignore these kind of lies! No need to post those, Susan!

        Thank you

      50. awfulhangover Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:15 pm

        Topalov is trying to compete with Fischer in the displine called “weird chess conspiracy theories”.
        Both were admired, and both became crazy and lost all respect, except from other looneys.

      51. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:42 pm

        Topalov’s charges are serious, and the evidence supporting those charges is also serious. A court suit before an impartial court will be the best decision for Topalov. It will be bad for chess though courtesy of Kramnik and his mafia friends.

      52. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 3:49 pm

        If we speak of overblown ego, Vohaul is the glaring example here. He is lost so much in his narcissism that he interviews himself with nobody asking him to do this and nobody caring for him either.

      53. Vohaul Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:03 pm

        @last anonym: GREAT

        so – i am in good company…

        play chess and you’ll never stay alone … ^^

        😛

      54. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:04 pm

        Once upon a time Kramnik indeed was a DEEP GREAT Creative chess player. His illness of the last few years has seen his chess suffer, but ofcourse he has a reputation to maintain. Secondly chess has rapidly moved on and Kramnik is slowly lacking behind, many Kramnik supporters blindly fail to notice this. From a 2700+ point of view Kramnik’s chess has been in slow decline,his blunder rate and consisitency of his play questioned. The reason Kramnik agreed to short draws was kind of masking his illness due to chess falability. Topalov’s claim in Elista is 100% valid, ”A CHESS PLAYER SHOULD NOT BE TAKING REGULAR WALKS IN A SMALL TOILET WITH THE DOORS CLOSED”!!! Kramnik has Powerful Freinds (RUSSIA/GERMANY/CHESSBASE), They protect him.. when will the naive world learn that this World is evil?, full of dubious deeds to protect one’s interest. That is the Bottom line. NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOU THE PUBLIC. Self interest first Do not let Kramnik’s noble front Deceive you? He has devious freinds in Power. Please open your eyes and learn to reason for your self rather than be totally media dependent i.e. chessbase and all those biased forums that don’t see the light.

      55. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:07 pm

        Kramnik is a farce and you chess public just choose to be blind to see it

      56. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:10 pm

        >> play chess and you’ll never stay alone …
        Nobody here does self-interview so you really are alone in this respect, Vohaul.

      57. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:16 pm

        ”A CHESS PLAYER SHOULD NOT BE TAKING REGULAR WALKS IN A SMALL TOILET WITH THE DOORS CLOSED”!!!

      58. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:20 pm

        HOW MUCH MORE PRROF DO YOU NAIVE PUBLIC WANT?? Kramnik is a farce, people say they want proof, He claims he was taking walks in the toilet, but the door was closed. I think we have a naive public that enjoy being ‘lied to’. There are so many things that strongly imply Kramnik’s behaviour was suspicious. You Kramnik supporters just choose to have a blind eye, ”equivalent to a Wife who knows her husband is cheating on her but accepts the lies he tells her because she has not caught him on camera and loves him”, yet she has many other signs of evidence. Jeezus Christ … open you eyes. Kramnik has Dubious, Powerful freinds and Russia is desperate to hold their title, they have done so for 70 years (Excluding Fischer) and intend to go on for another Generation, and will do everything in thier Power to do so. PUBLIC PLEASE USE YOUR BRAIN FOR ONCE AND SEE THE LIGHT.

      59. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:45 pm

        RUSSIA/GERMANY/CHESSBASE

        The axis of evil in chess?

        Please open your eyes and learn to reason for your self rather than be totally media dependent.

        Well, if you try this you can easily fall flat on your face, as it needs a certain amount of intelligence to reason. Unfortunately, everyone thinks he himself has an ample ammount of brains. Nowadays, people even post their “findings” in public forums an thereby openly unveil their complete lack of brains. They are not even embarrassed by making a fool out of themselves. Pitiable people, you and Topalov …

      60. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 4:49 pm

        Why do you post here as anonymous, Mr. Danailov?

      61. Vohaul Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 5:04 pm

        yeah… and after the russians, there will be armageddon – and He who saves souls and condemnes them by His will, will evidence that “His anger has torn me and hunted me down,” moreover, “He has gnashed at me with His teeth,” and of course: “My adversary glares at me.”

        i’m really afraid – ANGST … that’s why they call me “chicken brain” …

        but at least – it is a brain at all – small enough, but still going; and it thinks, that there is no need to “light (bring) in” a cheating accusation by an UTP-5 cable (to be plugged to WHAT????) passed behind the ceiling’s carpeting of the toilet of an official building…

        come on guys – Topalov should concentrate on chess instead of obscure allegations to Kramnik, the no longer existing KGB and the Kremlin (three “K’s”) – otherwise it could happen to him to be the second rated chess player of the chess great power of iceland… (not a 4 moves mate – but in 10 – with an FORCED starting move … ok – i’m chicken brained – and rh4!! was not that easy to find with 2 min on the clock)

        sincerly – yours narcist – Vohaul

      62. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 5:23 pm

        At one point Topalov leads by one full point.
        It is his own fault to let go that.
        And he has his own advantage during the tiebreak, but he can not capitalize on that.
        Even if it is true that Kramnik is cheating, you should not let go the other game by a simple blunder.

        It seems to me, it is easy to say when I lose, that means the other party is cheating. When I win, ok yes, it is a fair game.

      63. The anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:07 pm

        I’m “poor Kramnik’s heater” but I can’t stand Topalov’s Cry-baby’s complaintments too)

        Topalov:you missed a simple checkmate in 3.

        Topalov: you blundered a lot in other two games of the match.

        Topalov: you lost in rapid games tie-break where Kramnik couldn’t cheat

        Therefore,you are not better player
        than Kramnik-the cheater.
        Be a man and take your loss like a man.

      64. gabor Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:21 pm

        Again, just repeating myself:

        It is far from beyond reasonable doubt that Kramnik may have cheated However, it is OVER. That is why Topalov’s recent statements bother me, because he must know that there is nothing he or anyone could do about the outcome of that match. Absolutely nothing. Even someone like I, who is not at all defending Kramnik that “no, he didn’t cheat”, can no longer take seriously Topalov’s behavior. No matter what happened, it happened, and now it is the past. The only way Topalov can change that, by changing it in the future by playing convincingly superior chess, which he didn’t so far.

        He should appreciate the fact, that the world of chess is now started to pay attention to the potential cheating problem in chess.

        Gabor

      65. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:27 pm

        Topalov is mentally ill and only mentally ill people support him.
        There is no point in discussing with all of them.

        IG

      66. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 6:38 pm

        It is sad to see. Another great chess player (Toplalov) descending into madness. I once had a seemingly reasonably individual argue to me that our moon was an alien spaceship for reasons too ignorant to go into here. He thought he had all the “proof” he needed to settle the case. Topalov’s proof of Kramnik’s cheating is about as strong as the one claiming the moon is a hollow interstellar transport.

        Topalov has the talent to regain the title, but nobody is going to want to play him if he continues with this crazy talk. He needs to concentrate on chess so he can go down in history as a repeat champion and not the Captain Ahab of chess.

      67. Anonymous Reply
        December 19, 2006 at 7:32 pm

        bobby vs topa for the real world champ!

      68. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:54 am

        Gee, who are these losers who confuse an alcohol dependency diagnosis with psychosis (mental illness)?

        > Said by yet another fake shrink.
        >> Gaging by this picture of Topalov, he should make a bee line for the nearest clinic.

      69. b2_billy Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:58 am

        > …who are these losers?
        Relax, relax, it is merely Danailov with his usual posturing…what a fool.

      70. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 5:02 am

        Topalov cannot lose with dignity, so he keeps up these accusations about Kramnik..

      71. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 6:32 am

        >> an UTP-5 cable (to be plugged to WHAT????)
        To a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) my dear genius Vohaul.

      72. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 6:36 am

        If everyone here cried for the 5 Bularian nurses who were unjustly accused and sentenced to death today in Lybia, as you now defend the cheater Kramnik, the nurses should have be freed and case forgotten long ago.

      73. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 7:18 am

        >> Gee, who are these losers who confuse an alcohol dependency diagnosis with psychosis (mental illness)?

        Said by a pitiful loser and outsider who doesn’t know the well-known fact that Topalov doesn’t drink alcohol.

      74. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 7:37 am

        >>Why do you post here as anonymous, Mr. Danailov?

        Because you post here as anonymous, Mr. Cheatnik.

      75. Vohaul Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:05 pm

        @anonymus 1.32.04 AM

        – you caught me fishing. it is clear now: Kramnik smuggled this PDA device (obviously made from synthetic material at all…) through all detectors or was able to hide it in the toilet (most probably in the middle of the night), at a place (maybe in the ceiling) where none of the officials – or even Topalov crew members (of course, all bribed or at least threatened for their lives by Kremlin or Kramnik himself) could find it!

        Kramnik simply has to go to the boys room to quickly dismount the carpeting (he is tall, so no problem!), fetch out the PDA from the hidden place – plug in the UTP-5 cable – and voilà – a FSB (fka KGB) friend could transmit him the actual position evaluation of deep fritz (after you @anonymus gave me a reality check, i’m convinced that Kramnik is a chessbase servant, and did receive deep fritz weeks before the official release)- what a pathetic cheater!

        – finally Kramnik has nothing more to do than to unplug the PDA, hide the PDA in a safe place, remount the ceiling carpeting and come out to make his move, to make the cheating starts all over again… 18 – 50 times a game – what a physical condition for someone who alleges to be ill… what a scammer…

      76. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:20 pm

        Vohaul, I don’t know whether you are truly stupid or you try here to appear so.

        All those acrobatics with the PDA device were not needed because Kramnik was not checked for a hidden device. Topalov was checked only, and the check was done with a mine detector.

        So all your complicated schemes are not necessary. It is much more simple. Kramnik has the PDA device in his pocket. He comes into the toilet, closes the door, takes down a loose WALL tile, connects PDA, waits a little for the server to calculate and send the move, unplugs the PDA, puts the wall tile in place, and hurries back to the chess table to make the move. This is possible even for a small child and maybe even for you if you train hard enough.

      77. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:36 pm

        “…Kramnik was not checked for a hidden device”

        Are you kidding, baby?

        IG

      78. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 2:40 pm

        >>Are you kidding, baby?

        No kidding, mommy.

      79. Anonymous Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 4:34 pm

        Kramnik only took the title from a patzer named Kasparov when he was at the height of his chess powers, of course he couldn’t be Topalov without cheating!

      80. Vohaul Reply
        December 20, 2006 at 4:38 pm

        ahh – i missed this fact – so – only Topalov was checked for electronic devices and Kramnik marched through without control? unbelievable FIDE ploy!

        btw: it makes the behaviour of Kramnik even more pathetic – but it also reflects a bad light on the professionalism of the Topalov team, doesn’t it?

        i’m with the blissfully ignorant …

        :))P

      81. Anonymous Reply
        December 21, 2006 at 6:19 am

        Just coming back from analysing the game 1 of kramnik-topalov.
        Topalov can force draw by repetion moves on move 39th, threatening to take pawn at f2 … why did he not do that ? He was one pawn short at that position, and fritz showing that this is draw position.

        I think it is his ambition to win game 1 that makes the downfall.
        Yes, that a lot of Kramnik moves resembles my fritz 9, but the same holds true for topalov moves too.

      82. Anonymous Reply
        December 22, 2006 at 6:32 am

        >> btw: it makes the behaviour of Kramnik even more pathetic – but it also reflects a bad light on the professionalism of the Topalov team, doesn’t it?
        >>

        Yes, it does. There are many failures on the part of contracting for which Danailov is personally responsible.

        1. The match had to be in a neutral country.

        2. Topalov shouldn’t have given his place in Mexico City to Kramnik

        3. It had to be stipulated the players not to be out of camera surveillance during the match.

        4. The check for hidden devices should have been made before each game on both.

        etc.

        Then the scandal may have been prevented.

      83. king_lear Reply
        December 23, 2006 at 10:42 am

        Hmmm…all this speculation of Kramnik using a PDA is pure nonsense. Look at Kramnik’s performance during the match: It was better when he stayed at the chess board in both the long games and the fast games.

        If anything, Kramnik’s frequent bathroom trips annoyed, and then really rattled Topalov. And now, rather than admitting that he choked, Topalov (and Danailov) continue this childish taunting.

        Verdict: Suspend Topalov for 1 year from all FIDE competition and issue him a warning: The next time Topalov slanders or libels FIDE and/or FIDE officials it will be 3 years. Or, Topalov forfeits all prize earnings for 3 years.

      84. Anonymous Reply
        December 23, 2006 at 10:56 am

        So..it is Sick-a-lov. How much are you being paid for this nonsense?

        >>Why do you post here as anonymous, Mr. Danailov?
        >Because you post here as anonymous, Mr. Cheatnik.

      85. Anonymous Reply
        December 23, 2006 at 11:02 am

        Ahhh..Danalove-himself…wrong you are. BTW, I have beaten or tied every grand master I have ever played (14 games). Therefore, I am the only rated player in the world who can make the claim to never having lost to a grand master. And…save your childish name calling for your child: Topalov.

        >> Gee, who are these losers who confuse an alcohol dependency diagnosis with psychosis (mental illness)?
        > Said by a pitiful loser and outsider who doesn’t know the well-known fact that Topalov doesn’t drink alcohol.

      86. regulating_agent Reply
        December 23, 2006 at 8:13 pm

        Perhaps Topalov’s and Danailov’s accusations and insults do not violate any FIDE rule.

        This then leaves all FIDE event organizers to simply not invite Topalov to any rated event for a period of 3 years: a de facto ban.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto

      Leave a Reply

      Cancel reply

      Improvement

      • Important Scholastic Coaching Tips
      • My Chess Quotes Over The Years
      • My kids know chess rules. What’s next?
      • Chess Parenting

      Events

      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 3) May 13, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 2) May 12, 2021
      • My Top 10 Most Memorable Moments in Chess (Part 1) May 10, 2021
      • About Susan Polgar April 9, 2021
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Daily News
      • My Account
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Privacy Policy

      Anand Armenia Breaking News Chess Club and Scholastic Center of St Louis Chess interview Chess Olympiad Chess tactic Chess tournament chess trivia China FIDE Grand Prix Holland India Khanty-Mansiysk LIVE games Lubbock Magnus Carlsen Moscow National Championship Norway OnlineChessLessons Philippines Puzzle Solving Russia Scholastic chess Spain SPF SPICE SPICE Cup St Louis Susan Polgar Tata Steel Chess Texas Tech Tromsø TTU Turkey Webster University Wesley So Wijk aan Zee Women's Chess Women's Grand Prix Women's World Championship World Championship World Cup

      June 2026
      M T W T F S S
      1234567
      891011121314
      15161718192021
      22232425262728
      2930  
      « Sep